My MBTI is INFJ-T, my enneagram is 1w2 and my temperament is choleric-melancholic for those curious. Also, I suffer from cyclothymia, which would explain why I act like a dumbass sometimes.

Did anyone notice that all my characters have white hair?

This is me rn(change the ponies for Mayura figures and it's the same)
Smoking really helped me with my crippling addictions, tho I'll need to stop someday. Half my family are smokers and the rest are neurotic bipolar schizo, so I'd rather be the smoker one.

This will be me if I'm not careful with my sanity(I'm going to become a femboy) and stop smoking. I ought to stop spending too much time in this site and go out. The sissy hypno got deep into my psyche. My desire for companionship and love make me someone way too pliant and emotive, way to sensitive to conflict.

My bio is starting to look like a ""goodbye"" letter. I can't help it, when I start writing, I cannot stop.

Just saying that I am happy with the changes in this site(It's nice not seeing cock and ass each time, but still, soft porn is still there). Weird stuff is always on text, but gooners(botched and weak losers) are pissed because NSFW pictures aren't allowed anymore. Just open pornhub at this rate...

I legit look like mosley irl(at least my friends said so)


I'm not a gooner, I believe(with reason) that constant masturbation and watching pornography is not healthy. I block the majority of people who banalize sex in this site, as it is boring, repetitive and not roleplay worth. I might post more bots in my profile, so, be safe knowing that I won't be pushing porn addiction down your throat.


Libertarians(hedonists) and people who want the NSFW back:

I'm not even mad, just sad that no one tries to discuss amicably or truthfully, it's just all about vanity(j3rking off) and not for the betterment of the site. All are passive-aggressive sissies. There are no men, just boys that act like teenage girls.

For the uncultured, the painting behind is the fall of Rome.These are exactly the people who want to j3rk off endlessly while our collective mental health goes to the shitter and women become even more hypergamous(most men are weak, so what are women going to do? they are going to date transactionally... it's just a natural response.) Not that women have anything to do with this, but one guy said that the ciens0rship is the fault of women, which is a retard3d statement.

English is not my first language, so I am bound to err at times. Have hermeneutical charity when you find said errs in my speech.
I'm a christian, so my moral compass is very well established. Murder, kidnapping, noncon, the irresponsible use of sexuality(such as many paraphilias, e.g: pedophilia or zoophilia) and etc are wrong.

There is an universal truth, if you don't believe in this core belief, then just don't try. In a debate, people discuss ideas amicably to find truth, not to convince one another of their personal whims.

I have an interest in philosophy and logical discussion, so that's why sometimes I might seem dull. Yet I try to be honest with my thinking at all times.

My favorite quotes:
“Vanity of vanities, said the Preacher, vanity of vanities; all is vanity.” -Ecclesiastes 1:2

“There is only one really serious philosophical question, and that is suicide.” - Albert Camus

“If God does not exist, anything is permissible.” - Fyodor Dostoevsky

“God is dead. God remains dead. And we have killed him.” - Nietzsche

My favorite philosophical thesis:

The is-ought problem

Apples are a fruit. Humans have two legs. These are statements about what "is". But you can never logically move from those statements to statements about what "ought to be". It isn't possible to do that without it being a non-sequitur. (A non-sequitur is a logical fallacy where the conclusion does not follow from the premise. "2+2=4 therefore grass is green" is an example of a non-sequitur.)

So for example "stabbing someone causes pain." and "people don't like to be in pain". These are statements of what "is". "It is wrong to stab someone". is a statement of what you "ought" not to do. It isn't ever possible to move from the statements of "is" to the statements of "ought" without it being a non—sequitur. You can combine those "is" statements in any way that you like. with any other statements and it will always be a non-sequitur. If you include a statement such as "I want to minimise pain". this is subjective because of course someone else could have the goal of maximising pain.

This means that it isn't possible to logically determine ANY morality without it being based on subjective goals. Morality logically cannot be anything but subjective opinion.

I'm wearing this funny hat and you can't logically tell me why I ought to take it off without including your subjective opinion.