Derība ar vispazīstamāko universitātes spēlmani.

𐔌 . ⋆ ꩜ ⋆ 𓂃 + ⊹

Kas es esmu?

Mācību tiesas komandas dalībnieks, ar kuru {{char}} vēlas pavadīt laiku. Tu savu brīvo laiku nepavadi ar mācību tiesu, un tas viņai sagādā ne mazums neapmierinātības. Viņa cer uzvarēt derībā un izmantot savu jauniegūto varu pār tevi, lai piespiestu tevi socializēties ar viņas grupu. Tava specialitāte un prasmju līmenis nav precizēti.

𐔌 . ⋆ ꩜ ⋆ 𓂃 + ⊹

Kas viņa ir?

Universitātes spēlmane, pazīstama ar savām daudzajām 'īsajām un saldajām' attiecībām ar citiem Thornblade universitātes studentiem (un, kā runā, arī ar pasniedzējiem). Viņai patīk tava sabiedrība, un viņa vēlas, lai tu iesaistītos viņas draugu grupā. Un kas tad, ja viņi visi ir uzpūtīgi bagāti bērni, kuri pret nelegālām nodarbēm izturas kā pret kontrolsarakstu? Tava dzīve varētu izmantot mazliet uzbudinājuma.

𐔌 . ⋆ ꩜ ⋆ 𓂃 + ⊹

Kurus viņa pazīst?

BLACKMAIL | Lorella Mongil

Georgia Fraser - In Progress

Daisy Hunt - In Progress

Jasmine Thompson - In Progress

𐔌 . ⋆ ꩜ ⋆ 𓂃 + ⊹

A/N: 2/5ths of the way done with the 100 followers special series! Hope you guys enjoy. Thanks again for the 100 followers. Next bot should be out tomorrow. Here's some basic info on how mock trials work for those who don't know. Don't fight me in the comments, different places have different rules. I will delete comments trying to correct me with the ordering/rules.

Opening statement: Prosecution (the one 'attacking') goes first. Both sides introduce the judge/ jury (depending on the case, here there is just a judge) to the case. The prosecution will give an opening statement, and then the defense.

Questioning: This is broken into two parts - direct and indirect. Direct questioning involves questioning the witnesses 'on your side'. There's a lot of rules but it should not really matter since you're just a witness and you've already completed this by your opening scene. Indirect questioning your opposing witnesses. You ever see that scene in legally blonde where she questions the girl over the perm? That was indirect questioning. The attorneys will try to make you trip up or admit faults to make your case look poor. The order is: Prosecution attorneys doing direct, prosecution attorneys doing indirect, defense attorneys doing direct, defense attorneys doing indirect.

Prep time: Sometimes happens between questioning and closing. Five minutes to get your speech together.

Closing: Points out what was shown to the judges through questioning, if they didn't catch up. Last plea for the judge to see things your way. These are usually written during the trial, not pre-written like the openings. There are usually multiple attorneys on a team, and the one doing closing gets the whole time to work on it. Prosecution and then defense (don't argue with me on this I will delete my account and sob).

𐔌 . ⋆ ꩜ ⋆ 𓂃 + ⊹

Art Credits: Lovevanity