Okay, as some of you may remember, I'm a Poppy Playtime fan. Since its release, I've been closely following this product and its fandom. Now, Chapter 5 has been released (which, in my personal opinion, is 20/10 for lore and 6/10 for gameplay), and fans (including myself) have had a "Hear me out" moment with the prototype. What happened? The fandom started accusing anyone who simped the prototype of being a p3d0, and you know what? This crap is stupid, not only because it makes the word "p3d0" lose its meaning, but also because it doesn't make sense (el culo no tiene que ver con las pestañas pues). But don't worry, I'll explain.

Why doesn't simping the prototype make you a p3d0 or a l0l1/sh0t4 lover? Simple: the prototype doesn't act or look like a child. "B-But Bon! Toys never grow up or mature after becoming toys!" Yes, I know, but let's be honest, even though it's confirmed information, we can all agree that there are toys that, without this fact, you would NEVER imagine were children. The few toys that I could say, in my own opinion, do act or look like children are: Kissy, Huggy, Poppy, and any of the Critters.

As a FNAF fan, I've already had this conversation, and it's surprising that FNAF understood faster that you're only simping the animatronic/toy, and not the person inside. It's basically the same situation, but now with people who BARELY know this type of horror or situations involving "children's souls in a non-organic body." But the answer is always the same: nobody, NOBODY, cares about the child; they only care about the animatronic/monster/toy, etc.

And to finish my argument, the phrase "Yeah, the prototype doesn't act or look like a child, but it still is one and—and you're still weird!" is the worst. Under that logic, l0l1s who are 1000+ years old aren't bad, because sure, they look and act like children, but hey, they're older! Don't be so stupid. You blame simps of these kinds of characters who "are younger" (in quotes because, in my own opinion, Oliver, who embodies the prototype, was probably a teenager when he became the prototype) more than the sh0t4/l0l1 fans, very few of whom (really, very few) are fans of characters who fit the 1000-year-old stereotype. The other 90% are children who are no older than 14. But no, you judge characters by their appearance when it suits you. The prototype doesn't look like a child, so what? They blame all their simps. Jotaro from Jojo's doesn't look like a 16-year-old (yes, he is 16), and so what? Nothing, literally nothing. Both are minors, but they criminalize the simps of just one of them because, well, just because? It's curious how these same people don't also criminalize fans of FNAF or any work with characters who, if you don't investigate, you wouldn't even know are minors.

The word "p3d0" loses weight and seriousness because of this kind of crap. Let me remind you that a "p3d0" is attracted to childlike, innocent, vulnerable characteristics, etc., and this paraphilia is based on the satisfaction of having power over the most vulnerable. But nowadays it's so misused that they call anyone a p3d0. The funniest thing? Most of those who simp the prototype are also minors.

Well, I'm leaving. I wanted to say that because I was tired of seeing the same conversation revived, when the answer is very simple: they're monster fuckers, not pedophiles. Shut up for a while and instead focus on the fact that those who control us ARE the real p3d05.