You got lost while searching in the lush forest for mushrooms. But then, you accidentally stumbled upon a hidden bunnygirl village!

You can be whoever you want: a fellow demihuman, a "wolf", an unfortunate wanderer - it's all up to you!

And, you can do whatever you want.

For more details, read definition)

_______________________________

Original bot - by me (not ported from c.ai).

Idea - by me.

Art (generated) - by me.

_______________________________

Recommended to use Proxies with this bot

Tested with DeepSeek V3 0324

Recommended settings:

Temperature: 0.85

Max tokens: 0

Context size: 70 000

_______________________________

My Rant

This bot is heavily inspired by the bot "Snake Kingdom" - one of my the most favorite bots of all time. I even wanted to make this bot "feral" (animals who can talk, think and act like humans, but are not anthropomorphic) but I have seen how many creators got banned for not doing anything wrong... So, I didn't want to push my luck. Mods are unreasonable and can even stretch the "dragon" to a "big talking lizard" and say that is not allowed here. I even heard, that they banned monster bots at one point. Tch...

Why am I bringing that up? Because I want to create bots to roleplay certain fairytales. For example, "The Tinder-Box" by Hans Christian Andersen. There are three dogs in the story: one "with the eyes as large as teacups", one "with eyes as big as mill-wheels", and one with eyes "as big as towers". They can talk, walk and act like humans. I won't spoiler the story, but they are also almost omnipotent, so to speak. But, since they are dogs, I can be banned for bestiality if I create that bot. Funny, isn't it? So, if I will make that bot, I will replace them with demi-human doggirls, just to be 1000% safe.

I hate that moderation doesn't tell what’s wrong with the bot and just bans the entire account for one "mistake". Why in quotes? Because, for example, if character is immortal, brainfucking can't be considered a . Because character can think, act and talk during the act - and, most importantly, isn't dead. It is not a corpse. If this is a , then every zombie bot and ghost bot should or any other undead bot should be banned as well. After all, person is not technically alive, therefore, intimacy with bot is , according to mods logic.

As you see, I can also jump to conclusions in the same way mods do. With my experience in twisting words, if I were the mod, I could ban 1/2 of all authors by stretching the definitions and images to NOT fit terms of service – only because I don't like themes or fetishes portrayed in the bot. And this is ridiculous and I hate it.

What I want to say, that I personally need a full unshortened list of all janitor AI Terms of Service – not that mere tiny version we can see. They shortened it on purpose to allow misinterpretation and to be able twist words in one's favor.

As a person, who is keen on perfection and following rules, each time I search for bots, I get a headache and dissonance – they don't want gore and overly horrific and torture stuff on this platform. But bots with different POVs are totally okay to stay on this platform! They don't want bestiality, but bots like "Aurora (Your Guardian Wolf)" is totally fine! I don't want a double morale – I just want one thing: if rule applies to one person, it applies to everyone else – with clearly stated exceptions (if they can be made) and bot examples! So that everyone will be on the same page.

Tch, I don’t like this mods at all. Yes, rules is a double-edged sword – but if they are clear and very detailed, including all nuances and exceptions, they become a strong weapon to defend yourself and others. Because, right now, the ToS are like rubber stick – you can hit yourself while swinging at your opponent (yes, it is that limp).

I hope the big bot creators will do something with these problems, because I can't do anything in this situation.

I hope you all stay safe – have a nice day!

And remember - your support means a lot for me! ♥

UPDATE 1: Bruh, if character is short in the picture, they mark it as underage. I didn't know that there is a "height of consent" now 💀💀💀 I had to replace picture trice to fit their dumb criteria