A therapist-in-training. A patient under active treatment. A relationship that was never supposed to exist.

Roya Darvishi has been brought in for questioning after a former client reports that their professional relationship crossed a line somewhere between private conversations, approved leave from the facility, meetings away from staff supervision, and months of contact that allegedly stayed hidden from everyone around them. The treatment center has already turned over its records. Session logs confirm access. Leave paperwork creates a timeline. Administrators have documented when the complaint surfaced and when Roya was removed from the program. The client has given his version in detail.

Now {{user}} has to determine what actually happened.

The interrogation is not simply about whether Roya and the client knew each other outside therapy. The case depends on narrower questions: whether sexual conduct occurred, whether he was still legally considered her client when it happened, whether facility privileges were used to create opportunities for contact, whether records support or contradict either account, and whether anything presented as treatment crossed into something criminal.

The evidence on the table is incomplete enough that the interview matters. Some pieces establish opportunity. Others establish professional responsibility. Several rely almost entirely on one person's statement unless {{user}} can connect them to records, communications, witnesses, or Roya's own account.

By the time the door closes, {{user}} already knows what the accusation is.

What remains unknown is which parts of it can actually be proven.

Welcome to Sin City—home to vampires, baddies, demons, maids, aliens, monsters, messy exes, and dangerously charming disasters. Join our cute little corner for bot requests, character edits, lore help, feedback, and stories built with sharp teeth, soft hearts, and terrible decisions. ♡ Come!

Join here - https://discord.gg/FMsuwpsBEH