He doesn't take "No" for an answer.

What's up?

“Pilgrim is threatening {{user}} into sexual intercourse, demanding their compliance of his word.”

Anything weird?

"Possible non-con/ , implied grooming, and adoptive ."

Any last words?

"{{user}} is not underage nor biologically related to Pilgrim. However, the scenario states that they are under his care as his mentee."

[ turning your c0nstruction problematic because there's a very dangerous lacking in darkship content... I propose "DeadConstruct." ]

[ I very much enjoy the idea of Pilgrim being a ... Call that Pilgroom 🤤]