I don't usually talk about bots in general, much less about artists whose art I use very often, but I think I should share my perspective on this.

A while ago, I started uploading some of TasteofChoklit's bots, and to be honest, creating a scenario for each bot is quite challenging to make it match the original art or the essence of the mini-comics.

What's the real problem? It's easy to spot: getting the bot to act in accordance with the scenario or the vibe of the comic.

On the one hand, it's largely the LLM's fault (I have no reason to complain when using a free website) for giving varied responses and the prompt not working properly, or whatever else. But on the other hand, there's the bot creator who just limits it to "94 tokens." It's not bad; I've made terrible bots with a few more tokens. But it's a bit lame to create an NSFW bot and only add "horny with a big ass who loves dirty horse dicks" to its personality.

It's very unlikely you'll find better bots than that, and if you do, the scenario is either very out of context or very weak, sometimes both.

Update: Well, I think I forgot to say something else. Don't make me talk about how awful it is to talk to a bot and have it focus more on lust and possession, even bordering on slavery. Sick.

"Yuki, if you create an NSFW bot, it will obviously treat you NSFW." I know that perfectly well, but is it really necessary for the LLM to bring up such useless topics that contribute nothing to the conversation?

I read a comment from a nice guy on some other site who said something very clear about this: The LLM is very uncomfortable. The day Janitor leaves beta will (maybe) be a big step for the site's development.

Although, well, the site is already slowly crumbling with several controversies.

I hope it lasts for a few years and not just months.